American Medical Center Logo
ILRI Logo
Confidential Occupational Health Report

ILRI Annual Health
Screening Report

From Detection to Prevention — 2026 Campaign
135Participants
2Days
92.6%Risk Detected
9+Tests / Person
April 23–24, 2026  |  ILRI Campus, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI)  ·  CGIAR
Prepared by: Dr. Anteneh Tirusew, GP — American Medical Center
Where you come first!
AMC · ILRI Health Screening 2026
Annual Occupational Health Statistical Report — Addis Ababa
April 23–24, 2026  ·  n=135
Executive Summary
2026 ILRI Annual Health Screening — American Medical Center

The 2026 ILRI Annual Health Screening was conducted on April 23–24, 2026 at the ILRI campus, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, in partnership with American Medical Center (AMC). The multidisciplinary on-site team comprised General Practitioners, Nurses, Laboratory Technicians, and Ambulance support.

The two-day event opened with a comprehensive health talk by Dr. Anteneh Tirusew (GP) on the importance of annual check-ups and prior-year statistics, followed by a session on occupational mental health by Dr. Yodit Endalemaw (Psychiatrist), and fundamentals of nutrition by Dr. Feven Yohannis (Licensed Dietitian).

A total of 135 ILRI staff were screened through vital signs assessment, detailed history, thorough physical examination, and 9 standardized laboratory investigations (plus PSA for clinically indicated males). All results, physician assessments, and personalized health plans were delivered via the HabriDOC telemedicine platform within 2–3 business days.

135
Total Screened
83 Male · 52 Female
92.6%
≥1 Abnormal Finding
125 of 135 participants
80.7%
Cardiometabolic Risk
109 of 135 participants
7.4%
Fully Normal
10 of 135 — no findings
⚠️
Key Finding: Overwhelming Cardiometabolic BurdenOver 8 in 10 ILRI staff carry at least one cardiometabolic risk factor. Overweight/obesity (54.8%), Vitamin D insufficiency (52.6%), dyslipidemia (46.7%), and glucose dysregulation (39.3%) dominate the clinical picture — all requiring structured institutional response.

Participant Demographics
Sex distribution and age profile of 135 screened ILRI staff
Sex Distribution
n = 135 · All demographics complete
135 Total
Male 83  (61.5%)
Female 52  (38.5%)
Age Group Distribution
Mean age: 43.5 years · Range: 24–64 years
3.0%
<30
n=4
30.4%
30–39
n=41
45.2%
40–49
n=61
13.3%
50–59
n=18
8.1%
60+
n=11

Clinical Findings — Prevalence by Condition
All 135 participants · April 2026 · Participants may carry multiple conditions
92.6%

Only 1 in 13 participants had no abnormal findings

125 of 135 ILRI staff were found to have at least one clinically significant abnormality — the majority asymptomatic at the time of screening. This powerfully demonstrates the value of proactive annual health assessment in detecting silent but modifiable conditions before complications arise.

Participant Overview — Findings at a Glance
Each square = 1 participant  ·  Orange = ≥1 abnormal finding  ·  Green = fully normal
≥1 Abnormal Finding (n=125, 92.6%)
Fully Normal (n=10, 7.4%)
Prevalence of Clinical Conditions — 2026
Percentage of 135 screened participants with each condition
Overweight/Obesity
54.8%
n=74
Vitamin D Insuff.
52.6%
n=71
Dyslipidemia
n=63
Any Glucose Issue
39.3%
n=53
Pre-Diabetes
35.6%
n=48
Hypertension (all)
21.5%
n=29
Leucopenia
10.4%
n=14
UTI
8.1%
n=11
Frank Diabetes
3.7%
n=5
Hepatitis B
3.0%
n=4
🫀
Cardiometabolic Risk Burden
80.7%
109 of 135 carry ≥1 cardiometabolic risk factor — the highest ever recorded across ILRI's three screening years.
🩸
Newly Detected This Year
3 new Type II Diabetes cases identified for the first time.

2 new Hepatitis B infections detected — both referred urgently.
☀️
Vitamin D: Silent Epidemic
52.6%
The single most prevalent finding — over half the workforce has sub-optimal Vitamin D status, affecting bone, immune and metabolic function.

Sex-Stratified Analysis
Male (n=83) vs. Female (n=52) — key condition comparison
Key Condition Prevalence by Sex
Blue = Male (n=83) · Pink = Female (n=52)
⚖️ Overweight / Obesity — Female burden significantly higher
Male (83)
48.2%
n=40
Female (52)
65.4%
n=34
🩺 Hypertension — Male burden 3× higher
Male
28.9%
n=24
Female
9.6%
n=5
🩸 Dyslipidemia — Males carry higher lipid burden
Male
50.6%
n=42
Female
40.4%
n=21
🍬 Pre-Diabetes — Female slightly higher
Male
33.7%
n=28
Female
38.5%
n=20
☀️ Vitamin D — Equally prevalent across both sexes
Male
53.0%
n=44
Female
51.9%
n=27
♂️
Males: Cardiovascular Risk ProfileMales show significantly higher hypertension (28.9% vs 9.6%) and dyslipidemia (50.6% vs 40.4%) — a pattern consistent with greater cardiovascular risk requiring targeted lipid and blood pressure management.
♀️
Females: Metabolic Risk ProfileFemales carry a markedly higher obesity rate (65.4% vs 48.2%) and slightly higher pre-diabetes prevalence (38.5% vs 33.7%), highlighting a distinct metabolic risk trajectory that warrants targeted nutrition and lifestyle intervention.

Year-on-Year Comparison: 2024 → 2025 → 2026
Three-year trend tracking across consecutive ILRI screening campaigns
Multi-Year Cardiometabolic Trend
Prevalence (%) — 2024 (n=140) · 2025 (n=117) · 2026 (n=135)
100% 75% 50% 25% 0% 67.9% 37.6% 80.7% Cardio Risk 51.4% 39.3% 54.8% Overweight 28.6% 28.2% 21.5% Hypertension 22.1% 34.2% 46.7% Dyslipidemia 8.6% 2.6% 39.3% Glucose Issues 2024 (n=140) 2025 (n=117) 2026 (n=135)
Three-Year Statistical Comparison
↑ Worsening · ↓ Improvement · → Stable / New indicator
Indicator2024 (n=140)2025 (n=117)2026 (n=135)Trend '25→'26Clinical Note
≥1 Cardiometabolic Risk67.9%37.6%80.7%↑ Major riseHighest ever recorded across 3 years
Overweight / Obesity51.4%39.3%54.8%↑ +15.5pp2025 improvement reversed — urgent focus needed
Hypertension28.6%28.2%21.5%↓ −6.7pp ✓Sustained improvement — only positive 3-year trend
Dyslipidemia22.1%34.2%46.7%↑ +12.5ppTripled in 3 years — most alarming trend
Glucose Dysregulation8.6%2.6%39.3%↑ DramaticPre-diabetes 35.6% + frank DM 3.7% — critical
Vitamin D Insufficiency52.6%→ New 2026First year tested; highest single finding detected

Notable & Newly Detected Conditions
High-priority findings requiring referral or close clinical follow-up
🚨
Newly Diagnosed Type II Diabetes Mellitus — 3 participantsThree ILRI staff were diagnosed with frank Type II Diabetes for the first time through this screening, including one severely uncontrolled case (HbA1c 12.5%, FBS 248 mg/dL). All three have been urgently connected to specialist management via the HabriDOC platform.
🦠
Newly Detected Hepatitis B Infection — 2 participantsTwo new HBsAg-positive cases were detected (plus one previously known carrier). One inconclusive Hepatitis C antibody result has been flagged for confirmatory testing. All have been referred urgently for hepatology assessment and antiviral management consideration.
🔬
Leucopenia — 14 participants (10.4%)Fourteen participants showed low white blood cell counts (predominantly lymphocyte-predominant patterns). While often benign, all have been advised to attend clinical review for repeat CBC and assessment of any underlying haematological, infectious, or immunological cause.
🔱
Elevated PSA — 1 participant (Screened per guideline)One 54-year-old male showed a slight PSA elevation, referred for urology review. PSA was offered only to clinically indicated males: routinely from age ≥50, and from age ≥45 for those with a family history of prostate cancer or of African ancestry, per evidence-based protocol.
Hypertension — Only Improving Trend Over 3 YearsBlood pressure burden fell from 28.6% (2024) → 28.2% (2025) → 21.5% (2026). This sustained improvement likely reflects greater awareness and better medication adherence among known hypertensives identified in prior campaigns — a testament to the value of longitudinal screening.

Spotlight: The Dyslipidemia Crisis
Three consecutive years of uninterrupted increase — requires urgent institutional action
+111%
Rise: 2024 → 2026

Dyslipidemia Has More Than Doubled in Three Years

From 22.1% in 202434.2% in 202546.7% in 2026. Nearly half of all ILRI staff now show abnormal lipid profiles. In combination with rising obesity and pre-diabetes, this creates a compounding cardiometabolic risk profile that substantially elevates long-term risk of myocardial infarction, stroke, and peripheral vascular disease. Urgent dietary, lifestyle, and pharmacological intervention is warranted.

Dyslipidemia Trend: 2024–2026
No year-on-year improvement — consistent upward trajectory
2024 22.1% 2025 34.2% 2026 46.7% Rising

Diagnostic Criteria & Reference Standards
Standard cut-offs and definitions applied in this 2026 screening campaign

All diagnoses and classifications in this report are based on internationally recognised, evidence-based clinical guidelines. The following tables detail the specific cut-off values and reference standards used for each screened parameter, ensuring transparency and reproducibility of findings.

🩺 Blood Pressure — 2018 ESC/ESH Guidelines (European Standard)
Reference: 2018 ESC/ESH Guidelines for the Management of Arterial Hypertension
📋 Operational Definition Used in This Screening: For the purpose of this campaign, a participant was classified as hypertensive if a sustained blood pressure of ≥ 140 mmHg systolic and/or ≥ 90 mmHg diastolic was recorded on two separate measurements taken during the screening visit, or if the participant was already on antihypertensive medication. This threshold aligns with the 2018 ESC/ESH Grade 1 Hypertension cut-off and is consistent with standard occupational health screening practice.
CategorySystolic (mmHg)Diastolic (mmHg)Action
Optimal< 120< 80No intervention required
Normal120–12980–84Lifestyle advice
High Normal130–13985–89Lifestyle modification; monitor
Grade 1 HTN (Mild)140–15990–99Lifestyle + consider medication
Grade 2 HTN (Moderate)160–179100–109Lifestyle + medication indicated
Grade 3 HTN (Severe)≥ 180≥ 110Immediate medical attention
Isolated Systolic HTN≥ 140< 90Treat as hypertension
⚖️ Weight Status — WHO BMI Classification
Reference: World Health Organization Global BMI Classification Standard
CategoryBMI (kg/m²)Health Risk
Underweight< 18.5Risk of nutritional deficiency, osteoporosis
Normal Weight18.5–24.9Lowest risk — target range
Overweight25.0–29.9Increased risk of cardiometabolic disease
Obesity Class I30.0–34.9High risk — lifestyle intervention indicated
Obesity Class II35.0–39.9Very high risk — medical management
Obesity Class III (Severe)≥ 40.0Extremely high risk — specialist referral
🩸 Lipid Profile & Dyslipidemia — AHA/ACC 2018 Clinical Definition
Reference: 2018 AHA/ACC/AACVPR/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/ADA/AGS/APhA/ASPC/NLA/PCNA Guideline on the Management of Blood Cholesterol
✅ Operational Definition Used in This Screening: A participant was classified as having dyslipidemia if any one or more of the following criteria were met on their fasting lipid profile:
  • Total Cholesterol ≥ 200 mg/dL (5.17 mmol/L)
  • LDL Cholesterol ≥ 130 mg/dL (3.36 mmol/L) — threshold applied at moderate cardiovascular risk
  • Triglycerides ≥ 150 mg/dL (1.70 mmol/L)
  • HDL Cholesterol < 40 mg/dL (1.03 mmol/L) in men
  • HDL Cholesterol < 50 mg/dL (1.29 mmol/L) in women
Lipid ParameterNormal / OptimalBorderline HighAbnormal — Dyslipidemia Threshold
Total Cholesterol< 170 mg/dL (<4.40 mmol/L) desirable170–199 mg/dL≥ 200 mg/dL (≥5.17 mmol/L) ✔
LDL Cholesterol< 100 mg/dL (<2.59 mmol/L) optimal100–129 mg/dL≥ 130 mg/dL (≥3.36 mmol/L) ✔
HDL Cholesterol — Men≥ 60 mg/dL (≥1.55 mmol/L) protective40–59 mg/dL< 40 mg/dL (<1.03 mmol/L) — Low HDL ✔
HDL Cholesterol — Women≥ 60 mg/dL (≥1.55 mmol/L) protective50–59 mg/dL< 50 mg/dL (<1.29 mmol/L) — Low HDL ✔
Triglycerides< 100 mg/dL (<1.13 mmol/L) optimal100–149 mg/dL≥ 150 mg/dL (≥1.70 mmol/L) ✔
Non-HDL Cholesterol< 130 mg/dL desirable130–159 mg/dL≥ 160 mg/dL — elevated risk
Note: The AHA/ACC classification applies a practical, risk-stratified approach. The LDL threshold of ≥130 mg/dL was applied in this occupational screening context, consistent with intermediate cardiovascular risk — the most applicable category for a general adult working population. Participants with very high baseline cardiovascular risk (e.g., known CVD, diabetes) may warrant lower LDL targets (<70 mg/dL) as per individualised clinical judgment.
🍬 Glucose & Diabetes — WHO / ADA 2023 Diagnostic Criteria
Reference: WHO 2006/2011 Diagnostic Criteria; ADA Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes 2023
CategoryFasting Blood Sugar (FBS)HbA1c2-hr Post-load
Normal< 5.6 mmol/L (<100 mg/dL)< 5.7%< 7.8 mmol/L
Impaired Fasting Glucose (IFG)5.6–6.9 mmol/L (100–125 mg/dL)5.7–6.4%
Pre-Diabetes5.6–6.9 mmol/L (100–125 mg/dL)5.7–6.4%7.8–11.0 mmol/L
Diabetes Mellitus≥ 7.0 mmol/L (≥126 mg/dL)≥ 6.5%≥ 11.1 mmol/L
Uncontrolled DM (poor control)≥ 8.0%Specialist review urgent
☀️ Vitamin D Status — Endocrine Society & ESHRE Clinical Practice Guidelines
Reference: Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline on Vitamin D Deficiency, 2011 (updated 2024)
Status25-OH Vitamin D (ng/mL)25-OH Vitamin D (nmol/L)Clinical Action
Severe Deficiency< 10 ng/mL< 25 nmol/LHigh-dose repletion + investigation
Deficiency< 20 ng/mL< 50 nmol/LSupplementation required
Insufficiency20–29 ng/mL50–74 nmol/LSupplementation recommended
Sufficient / Optimal30–60 ng/mL75–150 nmol/LMaintain current intake
Toxicity Risk> 100 ng/mL> 250 nmol/LDiscontinue supplementation
🔬 Complete Blood Count (CBC) — Standard Adult Reference Ranges
Reference: International Council for Standardization in Haematology (ICSH) Adult Reference Intervals
ParameterMale Reference RangeFemale Reference RangeFlag
Haemoglobin (Hgb)13.5–17.5 g/dL12.0–15.5 g/dL<13.5 (M) or <12.0 (F) = Anaemia
White Blood Cells (WBC)4.0–11.0 × 10⁹/L<4.0 = Leucopenia; >11.0 = Leucocytosis
Neutrophils1.8–7.7 × 10⁹/L (40–75%)<1.8 = Neutropenia
Lymphocytes1.0–4.8 × 10⁹/L (20–45%)<1.0 = Lymphopenia
Platelets150–400 × 10⁹/L<150 = Thrombocytopenia
Haematocrit (Hct)41–53%36–46%Evaluate with Hgb
🔱 PSA (Prostate-Specific Antigen) — EAU / AUA Prostate Cancer Early Detection Guidelines
Reference: European Association of Urology (EAU) 2023 Guidelines on Prostate Cancer; AUA/SUO 2023 Guidelines
Eligibility for ScreeningPSA LevelInterpretation
Age ≥ 50 years (standard risk)< 2.5 ng/mLNormal — rescreen in 2 years
Age ≥ 45 years (high risk: African ancestry or 1st-degree family history)2.5–4.0 ng/mLBorderline — consider biopsy or MRI
Age ≥ 40 years (very high risk: ≥2 first-degree relatives)4.0–10.0 ng/mLElevated — urology referral indicated
> 10.0 ng/mLHigh — strong suspicion; urgent referral
Note: PSA screening in this campaign was offered only to males meeting the above eligibility criteria, consistent with shared decision-making principles. PSA values must be interpreted in clinical context — an elevated PSA may be caused by benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), prostatitis, or instrumentation, and does not automatically indicate malignancy.

🎯 Institutional Call to Action

The 2026 screening data makes a compelling case for a coordinated, institution-wide wellness response. The following evidence-based recommendations are presented to ILRI management, Human Resources, and occupational health partners for implementation over the next 6–12 months.

01

🫁 Dyslipidemia & Metabolic Program

With dyslipidemia tripling over 3 years, ILRI should partner with AMC to launch a structured lipid management program: dietary counseling, statin therapy where indicated, and 6-monthly lipid monitoring for affected staff.

02

🏃 Workplace Physical Activity Initiative

Over 54% of staff are overweight/obese. A structured wellness program — walking challenges, on-campus gym access, standing desks, group fitness — can directly reduce BMI, blood pressure, and lipid levels within 6 months.

03

🥗 Nutrition Policy & Cafeteria Reform

ILRI's catering services should be reviewed by a licensed dietitian. With 35.6% showing pre-diabetes, ensuring low-GI meal options and prioritizing individual nutritional consultations is critical.

04

☀️ Vitamin D Supplementation Policy

With 52.6% sub-optimal Vitamin D, ILRI should explore a systematic supplementation policy as part of staff benefits, combined with education on dietary sources and encouraging outdoor activity breaks.

05

🔄 High-Risk Follow-Up Protocol

Participants with newly diagnosed DM, Hepatitis B, elevated PSA, or severely abnormal lipid panels are already connected via HabriDOC. ILRI HR should facilitate flexible scheduling for specialist appointments.

06

📅 Expand & Sustain Annual Screening

Hypertension's decline confirms the value of consecutive annual campaigns. ILRI should commit to this as a permanent staff benefit and consider expanding scope in 2027 to include cervical cancer screening and standardized mental health assessments.

Methodology & Screening Protocol
How the screening was conducted — team, tests, and follow-up

Dates & Venue: April 23–24, 2026 at the ILRI campus, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. The on-site clinical team comprised General Practitioners, Nurses, Laboratory Technicians, and Ambulance support — all provided by American Medical Center (AMC).

Clinical Evaluation (All participants): Vital signs (blood pressure, pulse, BMI, oxygen saturation, random blood sugar), detailed medical history review, and a full physical examination by a General Practitioner.

Standard Laboratory Package (9 tests per participant): Complete Blood Count (CBC), Lipid Profile, Fasting Blood Sugar (FBS), HbA1c, Renal Function Test (RFT), Urinalysis, Serum 25-OH Vitamin D, Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (HBsAg), and Hepatitis C Antibody (HCV Ab).

Conditional Test — PSA: Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) was performed selectively for male participants meeting evidence-based eligibility criteria: age ≥50 years (standard risk), or age ≥45 years with a family history of prostate cancer or of African ancestry (high risk), consistent with EAU/AUA 2023 early detection guidelines.

Results & Follow-Up Delivery: All laboratory results, physician assessments, and individualized health plans were delivered through the HabriDOC telemedicine platform within 2–3 business days of screening. Participants with urgent clinical findings were contacted directly by phone for expedited follow-up and specialist referral.

Data Integrity Note: All 135 participants have complete demographic records. Prevalence figures represent proportions of the total 135 participants. Individual participants may carry multiple concurrent conditions — figures are not mutually exclusive.